Online Learning and Post-Secondary Expectations
![]() |
Online Learning and Post-Secondary Expectations |
Welcome to Higher Education, here we are not just talking
about higher education but everything to do with education, be it character
education, special education, Academic Education, Professional Education,
Education Commissioner, Science, World Universities, Colleges and other Best
forth. In order to increase knowledge of the importance of friends of education
and How choose appropriate education and basic interests of each individual.
This time I will discuss about the Online Learning and Post-Secondary
Expectations, probably many who do not understand what is meant by the Online
Learning and Post-Secondary Expectations. Therefore, let's just see explanation
below on “Online Learning and Post-Secondary Expectations”.
Because of the increase of online learning on college
campuses, some researchers primarily concern themselves with student
perceptions to online learning. Others are concerned with the changes they
would consider beneficial through the instructor perspective (Lederman &
Jaschik, 2013). Both groups want to determine the breakdown between the
structure of online courses and student success. Therefore, attention needs to
be turned to the academic leaders such as the coordinators, directors, and
deans of distance learning.
To support the need for increased professional development
for instructors of online courses, a study reported that “70% of faculty
members describe their institution’s support for online instruction as average
or below, and nearly 20% of all institutions do not offer any support…, and
more than one-third of faculty members who have developed or taught an online
course report that developing and teaching online courses takes much more work
than traditional courses”. Among the types of training that Herman advocates
for are those provided through professional development from academic leaders
and training tied to evaluation programs. Furthermore, Lane (2013) explains
that online course training requires a different set of skills from academic
leaders and appropriate professional development programs should be in place.
Moreover, Clay, who is an Academic Coordinator for Distance Learning in
Georgia, states, “deans can improve online learning and help me do my job by
requiring their supervisors with direct-report faculty and all faculty members
themselves to be thoroughly trained in the LMS functionality before a faculty
member is allowed to teach online” (personal communication, November 21, 2013).
This could improve the quality of training of online course instructors and
additional guidance would enhance the success of online learning for students.
Additional professional development is needed from academic leaders, and these
leaders should take a skills approach to leadership as Katz (1955) suggests. Online
learning is “engaging [to] the learner in reflective and collaborative thought
processes through learner-to-learner interaction results in the most effective
learning” (Cox and Cox, 2008, p. 553). In addition, online learning can open
the doors to communication between peers and students (Cox and Cox, 2008). As a
result, online learning can be a powerful tool to educate today’s population of
scholars because they are already submersed in it through social media,
texting, and the Internet.
Since schools around the world are embracing online learning
as a prominent feature on college campuses (Lederman & Jaschik, 2013),
education must be prepared for this influx of technologically driven students.
Less contemporary educators tend to be against online learning and would rather
not change the world of education through the influx of technology. However, it
is important to note that the beginnings of online learning, distance
education, independent study, or any of the myriad of terms sprouted from
economic, social, and physical disabilities limiting individuals from attending
a school (Schulte, 2011). By offering so many online learning opportunities,
institutions might be counterproductive and aiding the same impairments that
online learning was meant to prevent.
The purpose of this study is to explore the leadership gap
that exists between instructors and academic leadership that prohibits students
from being successful in online courses, which is the result of academic
leaders who inadequately prepare faculty. This is a leadership gap because
programs should be established by the administrators to ensure all avenues of
learning are addressed. As the enforcers of the college’s strategic plan,
academic leaders should be held accountable for training the staff to teach
growing numbers of online courses. Students’ experiences in online learning are
a direct result of the instruction they receive. However, instructors can only
educate students based on the knowledge and training they receive. Furthermore,
academic leaders should employ strategies to bridge the gap between the
instructor and the online learning platform. The skills approach to leadership
as outlined by Robert Katz (1955) is useful in examining the challenges and
experiences of the instructors and how those apply to the characteristics of a
leader. A skills leader possesses three different abilities: technical skills,
human skills, and conceptual skills (Katz as cited in Virkus, 2009). The skills
based leader recognizes that a particular knowledge base is needed in order to
conduct an institution effectively.
Thanks.
Post a Comment
Top comments
Newest first